Talk:Pokédex entry recycling: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pokédex entry recycling (view source)

Revision as of 14:54, 16 April 2024

271 bytes added , 16 April

→‎About merging

Landfish7

Administrators

18,730

edits

Revision as of 05:14, 16 April 2024 (view source) Daniel Carrero (talk \| contribs) (About merging)		Revision as of 14:54, 16 April 2024 (view source) Landfish7 (talk \| contribs) (→‎About merging) Newer edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:

	We also have separately the page "[[Foreign Pokédex entry]]", whose size is 20k. I think it is interesting that "Pokédex entry recycling" has been suggested to be merged with "Pokédex entry" but the page "Foreign Pokédex entry" was not suggested to be merged with them so far. If we decided to merge all three pages, it would be around 59k and the bulk of the content would be about entry recycling and foreign entries, but in my opinion it's OK to keep "Pokédex entry", "Pokédex entry recycling", and "Foreign Pokédex entry" as three separate pages. --[[User:Daniel Carrero\|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero\|talk]]) 05:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)		We also have separately the page "[[Foreign Pokédex entry]]", whose size is 20k. I think it is interesting that "Pokédex entry recycling" has been suggested to be merged with "Pokédex entry" but the page "Foreign Pokédex entry" was not suggested to be merged with them so far. If we decided to merge all three pages, it would be around 59k and the bulk of the content would be about entry recycling and foreign entries, but in my opinion it's OK to keep "Pokédex entry", "Pokédex entry recycling", and "Foreign Pokédex entry" as three separate pages. --[[User:Daniel Carrero\|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero\|talk]]) 05:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
			:Yeah keeping them separate makes the most sense to me. [[User:Landfish7\|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#32b761">'''Land'''</span>]][[User talk:Landfish7\|<span style="font-family:Tahoma;color:#5f6775"><small>'''fish7'''</small></span>]] 14:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)