Size and weight variation: Difference between revisions

m
→‎Rates: I assume this table was intended to be sorted by size (since it's clearly not attempting to be sorted by rate)
m (→‎Rates: I assume this table was intended to be sorted by size (since it's clearly not attempting to be sorted by rate))
Line 44: Line 44:
|-
|-
| 2'3" || 68.6–69.7 cm || 0.345%
| 2'3" || 68.6–69.7 cm || 0.345%
|-
| 2'5" || 74.3–76.1 cm || 2.890%
|-
|-
| 2'6" || 76.2–78.7 cm || 4.294%
| 2'6" || 76.2–78.7 cm || 4.294%
Line 52: Line 54:
|-
|-
| 2'9" || 83.9–85.5 cm || 1.892%
| 2'9" || 83.9–85.5 cm || 1.892%
|-
| 2'5" || 74.3–76.1 cm || 2.890%
|-
|-
| 2'10" || 88.0–88.8 cm || 1.923%
| 2'10" || 88.0–88.8 cm || 1.923%
Line 86: Line 86:
|-
|-
| 4'6" || 137.2–139.6 cm || 0.737%
| 4'6" || 137.2–139.6 cm || 0.737%
|-
| 4'7" || 139.7–142.2 cm || 0.040%
|-
| 4'8" || 142.3–144.7 cm || 0.038%
|-
|-
| 4'9" || 144.8–147.3 cm || 0.122%
| 4'9" || 144.8–147.3 cm || 0.122%
Line 98: Line 102:
|-
|-
| 5'2" || 157.5–160.0 cm || 0.089%
| 5'2" || 157.5–160.0 cm || 0.089%
|-
| 4'7" || 139.7–142.2 cm || 0.040%
|-
| 4'8" || 142.3–144.7 cm || 0.038%
|-
|-
| 5'3" || 160.1–162.5 cm || 0.038%
| 5'3" || 160.1–162.5 cm || 0.038%