29
edits
Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Apopheniac (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 480: | Line 480: | ||
The point of bulbapedia articles is to study trends, analyse information regarding pokemon. This entire website is built by fans for fans, and the trio master concept is one that has been prominent for generations. As I noted earlier, the point of any online internet archive, rather any system of categorization is to clarify classification. The trio masters among the legends are dominant. That, is, therefore a way to classify these unique legendaries, and therefore, definitely scores to deserve an article. Also I'd like to request to not confuse personal feelings with facts for these very important articles. Trio master article deserves to stay, but if thr name feeld odd, we can discuss a name change. [[User:Lucifer Lawliet|Lucifer Lawliet]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Lawliet|talk]]) 06:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | The point of bulbapedia articles is to study trends, analyse information regarding pokemon. This entire website is built by fans for fans, and the trio master concept is one that has been prominent for generations. As I noted earlier, the point of any online internet archive, rather any system of categorization is to clarify classification. The trio masters among the legends are dominant. That, is, therefore a way to classify these unique legendaries, and therefore, definitely scores to deserve an article. Also I'd like to request to not confuse personal feelings with facts for these very important articles. Trio master article deserves to stay, but if thr name feeld odd, we can discuss a name change. [[User:Lucifer Lawliet|Lucifer Lawliet]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Lawliet|talk]]) 06:00, 19 September 2023 (UTC) | ||
The previous discussion about "resolving the trio master issue" by @Jacob9594 has clearly stated two alternatives to solve this issue. And I, strongly, vehemently oppose the deletion of this article. I do agree with @landfish7 that we need a new page that highlights the relationship among different legendary pokemon groups and mythicals, but deleting this article would not really serve any purpose. We would need articles that link to the parent article about legendary pokemon relationships that describe all the different relationships in detail, unless we decide to put all of the information into one overcomplicated page of gargantuan proportions. By now we have duos, trios, qaurtets, quintets, and who knows, maybe even more such groups will evolve in the future. Instead of deletion, I'd like to propose this article be modified to denote the dominant legendary among groups, and the trio master serve as a category among those who constitute a trio. | |||
Deleting an article about a well established concept is harmful towards classification, and I'd also like everyone to go read up @Jacob9594's discussion on the same topic previous to this conversation. [[User:Lucifer Lawliet|Lucifer Lawliet]] ([[User talk:Lucifer Lawliet|talk]]) 07:40, 23 September 2023 (UTC) | |||