2,148
edits
No edit summary |
Transfinite (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
>I figure, for the English sets at least, why not use the numbering system used there? Like Base Alakazam is 1/102... [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 01:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | >I figure, for the English sets at least, why not use the numbering system used there? Like Base Alakazam is 1/102... [[User:Surskitty|surskitty]] 01:06, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) | ||
>>I'm thinking NAME (SET) (number). And the (number) part would only be if it's needed. For example, if there's a Wingull in the Wingulpwnz set, the page name would be "Wingull (Wingulpwnz)". If there are two Hoppip in the same set, though, they would be named "Hoppip (Wingulpwnz) (40)" and "Hoppip (Wingulpwnz) (41)", with "Hoppip (Wingulpwnz)" being a disambig. [[User:Ketsuban|Ketsuban]] 04:04, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) |
edits