Talk:Trio master: Difference between revisions

m (Relink to renamed page, replaced: Dragon Trio → Creation trio (8))
Line 472: Line 472:


Guys, I don't think we should delete this article. It may not be fact, but it's still Pokémon-related lore, therefore serving as Pokémon-related information, which is the literal reason why Bulbapedia even exists. Do you really think we should delete it? [[User:Lugia+Ho-Oh|Lugia+Ho-Oh]] ([[User talk:Lugia+Ho-Oh|talk]]) 01:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Guys, I don't think we should delete this article. It may not be fact, but it's still Pokémon-related lore, therefore serving as Pokémon-related information, which is the literal reason why Bulbapedia even exists. Do you really think we should delete it? [[User:Lugia+Ho-Oh|Lugia+Ho-Oh]] ([[User talk:Lugia+Ho-Oh|talk]]) 01:29, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
:I actually agree with deletion, since it's based on speculation and the criteria is unclear (what makes Rayquaza a trio master and not, say, Zygarde or Necrozma)? Any actual lore can be added to the respective trios' articles, while this vague term that doesn't even see wide use in the fandom in this day and age can be removed. [[User:Biblical Bambi|Biblical Bambi]] ([[User talk:Biblical Bambi|talk]]) 04:28, 14 August 2023 (UTC)