1,541
edits
User talk:CloudMonarch: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Hi, several of your recent edits were reverted because they were either trivia that didn't meet notability requirements, or because they were claims made that didn't have source material to back up said claim. Please try not to add trivia if it's not unique/notable for the given topic, and please provide a source or reference if you're going to make claims that aren't easily verified and/or common knowledge. Additionally, if you're going to make edits regarding research on a game mechanic, like how a move works, it helps if you can provide a source that backs up that mechanic works as described, or at the very least make a note on the talk page or describe what you tested in the edit summary, otherwise we can't be sure it was actually tested. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 09:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | Hi, several of your recent edits were reverted because they were either trivia that didn't meet notability requirements, or because they were claims made that didn't have source material to back up said claim. Please try not to add trivia if it's not unique/notable for the given topic, and please provide a source or reference if you're going to make claims that aren't easily verified and/or common knowledge. Additionally, if you're going to make edits regarding research on a game mechanic, like how a move works, it helps if you can provide a source that backs up that mechanic works as described, or at the very least make a note on the talk page or describe what you tested in the edit summary, otherwise we can't be sure it was actually tested. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 09:18, 15 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
: Hi again, several more of your recent edits were reverted again by other users for the exact same reason I described above. Please actually read your talk page messages and take the feedback seriously. Take the time to look at the [[Bulbapedia:Manual of style|Manual of style]], and the [[Bulbapedia:Notability requirements|Notability requirements]], otherwise it's very likely that your edits to pages will continue to be reverted by other users because they don't meet those standards. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 05:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | : Hi again, several more of your recent edits were reverted again by other users for the exact same reason I described above. Please actually read your talk page messages and take the feedback seriously. Take the time to look at the [[Bulbapedia:Manual of style|Manual of style]], and the [[Bulbapedia:Notability requirements|Notability requirements]], otherwise it's very likely that your edits to pages will continue to be reverted by other users because they don't meet those standards. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 05:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC) | ||
== Talk page policy == | |||
Hi again, two of your talk page edits were reverted because you were adding unnessicary comments to sections that were well over 6 months old, instead of starting a new section. This goes against the [[Bulbapedia:Talk page policy|Talk page policy]]. Once again, please take the time to read Bulbapedia's policies and standards, or your edits that violate them will continue to be reverted by staff and other users. [[User:Atrius97|Atrius97]] ([[User talk:Atrius97|talk]]) 15:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC) | |||