40,980
edits
Talk:Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions
→Highly Risky/Inappropriate Website Link
Mario60866 (talk | contribs) (→Highly Risky/Inappropriate Website Link: new section) |
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 189: | Line 189: | ||
I would greatly recommend removing all links to Kotaku from Bulbapedia, and banning it from the website and the forums. I would also recommend informing other popular Pokemon sites such as Smogon and Serebii that Kotaku is unsafe and they should lock it out as well. [[User:Mario60866|Mario60866]] ([[User talk:Mario60866|talk]]) 20:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | I would greatly recommend removing all links to Kotaku from Bulbapedia, and banning it from the website and the forums. I would also recommend informing other popular Pokemon sites such as Smogon and Serebii that Kotaku is unsafe and they should lock it out as well. [[User:Mario60866|Mario60866]] ([[User talk:Mario60866|talk]]) 20:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC) | ||
:Unless the website itself is known to be shady, a couple of bad reviews doesn't change anything. The site your using as reference says that it's considered safe under the "Is kotaku.com Safe?" sentence. Adult ads on other sites are, again, out of our control. Kotaku needs to deal with those ads, we can't do anything about their ads.--[[User:Force Fire|<span style="color:#44BAE5">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#85D2EE">orce</span>]][[User talk:Force Fire|<span style="color:#DA7D99">'''F'''</span><span style="color:#E7ABBD">ire</span>]] 05:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC) | |||