12,141
edits
Talk:Pokégear: Difference between revisions
→GSC Rematches and other chances
Rarecandybar (talk | contribs) (GSC Rematches probabilities (2)) |
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
::Thank you. May I ask what would be a more reliable source than [https://github.com/pret/ the disassembly] on Github? I am somewhat confident with it, as I have studied it for a while. I also test it for real whenever I can. Lately I have been learning about the overall phone mechanics in Generation II. | ::Thank you. May I ask what would be a more reliable source than [https://github.com/pret/ the disassembly] on Github? I am somewhat confident with it, as I have studied it for a while. I also test it for real whenever I can. Lately I have been learning about the overall phone mechanics in Generation II. | ||
::About the format, I think I could also add information about specific trainers on their own / Routes articles instead (for example, the triggers for higher rematches). I would like to keep it consistent in here, but prefer not to just add a ton of numbers. Hopefully a new column for random rematches will be less cumbersome than adding it to the Notes column. On the other hand, adding the chances of swarm/item can be added somewhere else, as they are pretty consistent across trainers. Thank you. [[User:Rarecandybar|Rarecandybar]] ([[User talk:Rarecandybar|talk]]) 23:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | ::About the format, I think I could also add information about specific trainers on their own / Routes articles instead (for example, the triggers for higher rematches). I would like to keep it consistent in here, but prefer not to just add a ton of numbers. Hopefully a new column for random rematches will be less cumbersome than adding it to the Notes column. On the other hand, adding the chances of swarm/item can be added somewhere else, as they are pretty consistent across trainers. Thank you. [[User:Rarecandybar|Rarecandybar]] ([[User talk:Rarecandybar|talk]]) 23:28, 1 December 2020 (UTC) | ||
:::I wasn't saying anything about reliability, I was talking specificity. "Source: the disassembly" is way less useful than "Source: https://github.com/pret/pokecrystal/blob/master/data/phone/phone_contacts.asm#L47" or something. Any vandal could just claim their source was "the disassembly". | |||
:::Also, especially when calculations etc. are involved, basically others have the possibility to potentially review your findings rather easily (so cases where code is misread or something, like [[Talk:List of Pokémon by wild held item#Gen III Item chances & Compound Eyes|here]], won't stick for too long). [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 00:15, 2 December 2020 (UTC) | |||