38,176
edits
Talk:Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions
m
→Should we bring up the Pokemon Go Battle League exploit as a controversy?
Celadonkey (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by LestherIvy (talk) to last revision by Celadonkey) |
|||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold. | If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold. | ||
Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page?{{unsigned|LestherIvy}} | Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page?{{unsigned|LestherIvy}} | ||
:It is something that would belong more on the Go Battle League page, this one is primarily meant for issues overarching the franchise as a whole. --[[User:Spriteit|Spriteit]] ([[User talk:Spriteit|talk]]) 08:47, 16 June 2020 (UTC) | |||