Talk:Pokémon controversy: Difference between revisions

Talk:Pokémon controversy (view source)

2 bytes added , 14 June 2020

22

edits

Revision as of 20:18, 14 June 2020 (view source) LestherIvy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should we bring up the Pokemon Go Battle League exploit as a controversy?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:18, 14 June 2020 (view source) LestherIvy (talk \| contribs) (→‎Should we bring up the Pokemon Go Battle League exploit as a controversy?) Newer edit →
Line 159:		Line 159:

	If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p\|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold.		If you guys didn´t knew On june 2 2020 There was reports of a user that did an exploit in the [[GO Battle League]] , the pokemon used for the exploit was primarly {{p\|Melmetal}}. People were adressing the situation and [[Niantic]] responded by banning the exploit user and putting the Go Battle League on hold.
	Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page?{\|LestherIvy}}		Should this be addresed here or in the Go Battle League page? {{\|LestherIvy}}