Talk:Fraxure (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

(→‎First Gen V Pokémon: Don't respond to comments older than 6 months, especially if it's worthless babbling)
 
Line 16: Line 16:
==First Gen V Pokémon==
==First Gen V Pokémon==
I edited the Trivia section with this fact, which I found out on ONM. [http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/24299/news/a-pokmon-thats-too-strange-theres-no-such-thing-says-sugimori/]--[[User:SpeedSuicune|SpeedSuicune]] 16:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
I edited the Trivia section with this fact, which I found out on ONM. [http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/24299/news/a-pokmon-thats-too-strange-theres-no-such-thing-says-sugimori/]--[[User:SpeedSuicune|SpeedSuicune]] 16:40, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
:In a [http://lavacutcontent.com/ken-sugimori-nintendo-dream-6/ Nintendo Dream interview], Sugimori instead said that Haxorus was the first Generation V Pokémon designed. Based on the fact that the Nintendo Dream interview was conducted without a translator and provides more detail on why (including the fact that its pre-evolutions were derived from its design), I believe that ONM's translator simply mixed up Haxorus and Fraxure. Furthermore, the fact that the ONM interview ([https://web.archive.org/web/20110304160826/http://www.officialnintendomagazine.co.uk/24299/news/a-pokmon-thats-too-strange-theres-no-such-thing-says-sugimori/ archived link]) mentions that the Pokémon's "side looks like an axe", which would surely refer to Haxorus rather than Fraxure. (Also, from checking my copies, the factoid about Fraxure was never published in the Official Nintendo Magazine itself, only ever on their website, although I'm not sure if that's relevant.)
:I believe that ONM made a mistake here, while Nintendo Dream has the correct information. --[[User:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#A70000">'''Snorlax'''</span>]][[User talk:SnorlaxMonster|<span style="color:#0000A7">'''Monster'''</span>]] 04:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)