25,227
edits
User talk:Glik/Archive July 2015-May 2018: Difference between revisions
User talk:Glik/Archive July 2015-May 2018 (view source)
Revision as of 22:36, 21 April 2018
, 21 April 2018→Types and "metagame" information
| Line 474: | Line 474: | ||
:Because type interaction isn't the metagame, it's a basic component. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 00:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC) | :Because type interaction isn't the metagame, it's a basic component. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 00:44, 21 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
::Not all of that stuff was about type interaction, though. For example, the sentence "The Normal type is a mixed bag defensively." That would obviously not be true for "metagames" in which fighting attacks were everywhere, so I think statements like that count as metagame information and don't belong on Bulbapedia. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 22:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC) | ::Not all of that stuff was about type interaction, though. For example, the sentence "The Normal type is a mixed bag defensively." That would obviously not be true for "metagames" in which fighting attacks were everywhere, so I think statements like that count as metagame information and don't belong on Bulbapedia. [[User:Sumwun|sumwun]] ([[User talk:Sumwun|talk]]) 22:12, 21 April 2018 (UTC) | ||
:::That's certainly un-encyclopedic phrasing and could be reworked into something better. If you think they're going past simple fact-stating, pare them down. <small>[[User:Glik|glik]]</small><sup>[[User talk:Glik|glak]]</sup> 22:36, 21 April 2018 (UTC) | |||