102
edits
Talk:Move Tutor: Difference between revisions
→Notable Pattern Regarding Move Tutor Availability: new section
(→Dragon Ascent: new section) |
Masternachos (talk | contribs) (→Notable Pattern Regarding Move Tutor Availability: new section) |
||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
I don't have access to Sun and Moon at the moment, but the move tutor list for Sun and Moon lists it as a Dragon type, but the move page lists it as a Flying type. Has the type been changed in generation VII or is this a mistake? [[User:TDoggy|TDoggy]] ([[User talk:TDoggy|talk]]) 13:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | I don't have access to Sun and Moon at the moment, but the move tutor list for Sun and Moon lists it as a Dragon type, but the move page lists it as a Flying type. Has the type been changed in generation VII or is this a mistake? [[User:TDoggy|TDoggy]] ([[User talk:TDoggy|talk]]) 13:57, 21 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
== Notable Pattern Regarding Move Tutor Availability == | |||
I may be wrong, but it seems that the games have featured a pattern since Generation III (definitely since Gen IV): the first games (Diamond/Pearl;Black/White;X/Y) only have those few tutor-exclusive moves that are taught for free, if that (Ruby/Sapphire having none). Then the later "waves" of games in that generation (FireRed/LeafGreen/Emerald;Platinum/HeartGold/SoulSilver;Black2/White2;OmegaRuby/AlphaSapphire) feature far more move tutors (and tutor moves), usually for shards or BP. Sun and Moon follows this "pattern" so far, being the first/main/completely original games of Generation VII and only having tutors for those tutor-exclusive moves. First, would this be enough to be considered an actual pattern? If so, would it be worth noting on the page? Or should we maybe wait to see how Generation VII progresses? [[User:Masternachos|Masternachos]] ([[User talk:Masternachos|talk]]) 01:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC) | |||