Talk:List of Pokémon by effort value yield (Generation V-VI): Difference between revisions

Incorrect base experience values for Gen VI
(Incorrect base experience values for Gen VI)
Line 125: Line 125:
Since most Pokémon had their base experience altered in Gen V, I think it would be best to have a separate list within this page, or in another page like how Base Stat lists are separated for Gen I, Gen II-V and Gen VI+. [[User:Trainer Yusuf|Trainer Yusuf]] ([[User talk:Trainer Yusuf|talk]]) 12:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Since most Pokémon had their base experience altered in Gen V, I think it would be best to have a separate list within this page, or in another page like how Base Stat lists are separated for Gen I, Gen II-V and Gen VI+. [[User:Trainer Yusuf|Trainer Yusuf]] ([[User talk:Trainer Yusuf|talk]]) 12:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
:Yes, there should be a separate page. For reference, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_by_effort_value_yield&diff=1245700&oldid=1217891 this] is right before Gen V changes were made to this page. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
:Yes, there should be a separate page. For reference, [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=List_of_Pok%C3%A9mon_by_effort_value_yield&diff=1245700&oldid=1217891 this] is right before Gen V changes were made to this page. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 12:37, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
== Incorrect base experience values for Gen VI ==
I have noticed that several dozen Pokémon on this page have different values for base experience than the values given on veekun.com's Pokédex. I have compiled a list of the conflicting values [http://pastebin.com/RyVJKstf here]. Nearly all of them are final evolutions, with the base experience value 4 or 5 points higher according to the veekun data. This leads me to believe there was an intentional recalibration of base experience values by Gamefreak in Gen VI for several final evolutions  (and alternate forms, and Megas, and some others as well) that Bulbapedia never noticed. Or, maybe the veekun data is wrong and this page is correct. But given this page's lack of form data (Megas, Eternal Floette, Rotom, Kyurem), I'm more inclined to believe veekun. Could someone more knowledgable than me verify which source is correct? And if it's not Bulbapedia, update the page appropriately? [[User:Porygon137|Porygon137]] ([[User talk:Porygon137|talk]]) 20:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
4

edits