13,668
edits
Talk:M05: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(→Movie 5 box office trivia.: new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
=Name= | ==Name== | ||
Wasn't Pokémon Heroes the name of the combination of the main movie and the Pikachu Short, while the name of the main movie was ''Latios & Latias''?--[[User:Johans|Johans]] 18:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | Wasn't Pokémon Heroes the name of the combination of the main movie and the Pikachu Short, while the name of the main movie was ''Latios & Latias''?--[[User:Johans|Johans]] 18:36, 11 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:Watching the movie, the logo shows the title as ''Pokémon Heroes: Latios & Latias''. On the other hand, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pok%C3%A9mon_Heroes.jpg the DVD itself] (containing the movie and the Pikachu Short) could be read as ''Pokémon Heroes: The Movie''. I'll try to get a screenshot soon. --[[User:Johans|Johans Nidorino]] 07:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | :Watching the movie, the logo shows the title as ''Pokémon Heroes: Latios & Latias''. On the other hand, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Pok%C3%A9mon_Heroes.jpg the DVD itself] (containing the movie and the Pikachu Short) could be read as ''Pokémon Heroes: The Movie''. I'll try to get a screenshot soon. --[[User:Johans|Johans Nidorino]] 07:27, 18 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
Okay, currently PumpkinKing is trying to delete the box office trivia simply because it wasn't notable. However, it ran uncontested as having the lowest box office record for 13 years, which definitely is a very long time. I think we really should at the very least note that it definitely had the lowest box office record until then, since that is notable. I could understand claiming that until the immediate next movie was not notable, but not a film that was undisputably the lowest performing film up until a movie released over a decade later, as that definitely has grounds for notability precisely BECAUSE of how uncommon that is. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] ([[User talk:Weedle Mchairybug|talk]]) 03:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | Okay, currently PumpkinKing is trying to delete the box office trivia simply because it wasn't notable. However, it ran uncontested as having the lowest box office record for 13 years, which definitely is a very long time. I think we really should at the very least note that it definitely had the lowest box office record until then, since that is notable. I could understand claiming that until the immediate next movie was not notable, but not a film that was undisputably the lowest performing film up until a movie released over a decade later, as that definitely has grounds for notability precisely BECAUSE of how uncommon that is. [[User:Weedle Mchairybug|Weedle Mchairybug]] ([[User talk:Weedle Mchairybug|talk]]) 03:06, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | ||
:Mosts (and sometimes leasts) are notable; runners-up and used-to-be-mosts/leasts are not. Those are our trivia standards across all of our pages. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 03:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC) | |||