91
edits
Talk:EP017: Difference between revisions
→No evil Pokémon: new section
mNo edit summary |
(→No evil Pokémon: new section) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
How negligible were the implications of genders that they weren't deemed confirmations of the Pokémon's gender? <span style="font-family:Cracked; font-size:125%"><sup>[[User:Tc26/Anime Predictions|<span style="color:#303030;">tc</span>]]</sup>[[User:Tc26|<span style="color:#e03828;">²₆</span>]][[User talk:Tc26|<span style="color:#303030;">tc</span>]]<sub>[[User:Tc26/Sandbox|<span style="color:#e03828;">26</span>]]</sub></span> 00:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC) | How negligible were the implications of genders that they weren't deemed confirmations of the Pokémon's gender? <span style="font-family:Cracked; font-size:125%"><sup>[[User:Tc26/Anime Predictions|<span style="color:#303030;">tc</span>]]</sup>[[User:Tc26|<span style="color:#e03828;">²₆</span>]][[User talk:Tc26|<span style="color:#303030;">tc</span>]]<sub>[[User:Tc26/Sandbox|<span style="color:#e03828;">26</span>]]</sub></span> 00:47, 10 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
== No evil Pokémon == | |||
In the trivia section it says, "Despite it being explicitly stated that there was no such thing as an evil Pokémon in this episode [...]". But is it really "explicitly stated"? From what I get, it's only Ekans' (and maybe Koffing's) opinion, which would make the trivia point kinda moot. - [[User:Mr. Flix|Mr. Flix]] | [[User_talk:Mr. Flix|Talk to me~]] 12:01, 21 March 2016 (UTC) | |||