1,632
edits
Talk:Eevee (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Fraudulent Mega Eevee Description for article in Bing Search: new section
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 257: | Line 257: | ||
::I was just wondering since most of the other articles don't usually list egg moves if they're in the lv up section. [[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 10:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ::I was just wondering since most of the other articles don't usually list egg moves if they're in the lv up section. [[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 10:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::They are listed if those moves only need one parent instead of both. A move is not an egg move if both parents are required to know the move for it to be passed down. Since Eevee only needs one parent to have those moves passed down, it's an egg move on top of being a level-up move. [[User:ArcToraphim|Kai]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 13:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | :::They are listed if those moves only need one parent instead of both. A move is not an egg move if both parents are required to know the move for it to be passed down. Since Eevee only needs one parent to have those moves passed down, it's an egg move on top of being a level-up move. [[User:ArcToraphim|Kai]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 13:42, 16 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
== Fraudulent Mega Eevee Description for article in Bing Search == | |||
So I did a '''Bing''' Search for Mega Eevee, just to see some fan art of what it would look like. The first website/article listed is this one, however the description caption reads as follows. | |||
''Aug 10, 2014 · Mega Eevee : Mega Eevee Y: Gender ratio. Unknown: 87.5% male, 12.5% female: Catch rate. ... An Eevee is seen as a Pokémon experimented on by …'' | |||
The description is indicating Eevee actually has at least one, version exclusive Mega Evolution. Why is this showing up, did someone put hidden code into the article that Bing is picking up? | |||
Anyways, I thought I would bring it up so that I could get a answer, and the Admin staff could take preventative action, maybe send Bing a note to fix it. I checked the same search on Google, and it does not show the fraudulent description. [[User:Yamitora1|Yamitora1]] ([[User talk:Yamitora1|talk]]) 00:42, 15 August 2014 (UTC) | |||