13,668
edits
Talk:Super Training: Difference between revisions
→Revision 2112800
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
:Anywho, if it wasn't on the others, that can be remedied. I do essentially like the idea of a description, and I'd be happy to see one for all the regimens. | :Anywho, if it wasn't on the others, that can be remedied. I do essentially like the idea of a description, and I'd be happy to see one for all the regimens. | ||
:I do think some of your descriptions could stand some editing to...make them more wiki-worthy (and some of the points like "a single shot may score both goals" are pure walkthrough material), but many of your description points were basically on point and worthwhile, IMO. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | :I do think some of your descriptions could stand some editing to...make them more wiki-worthy (and some of the points like "a single shot may score both goals" are pure walkthrough material), but many of your description points were basically on point and worthwhile, IMO. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 15:30, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
::For what it's worth, I didn't notice how opinionated that table was; I had my blinders on and was looking only at the standard Super Training table, which has no descriptions at all. I agree that toned-down it could be useful, but without mathematical data from the code itself, I'm not sure how to make it suitably neutral. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 15:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC) | |||