User talk:ArcToraphim/Archive2: Difference between revisions

(→‎Berry Sprites: new section)
(→‎Shipping stubs: new section)
Line 663: Line 663:


Shortly, I'm going to be creating pages for [[Kee Berry]] and [[Maranga Berry]]. I have sprites for them and [[Roseli Berry]], but I can't edit the file pages for the other berries to know what appropriate templates and categories need to be given to the files. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] ([[User talk:Drake Clawfang|talk]]) 22:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Shortly, I'm going to be creating pages for [[Kee Berry]] and [[Maranga Berry]]. I have sprites for them and [[Roseli Berry]], but I can't edit the file pages for the other berries to know what appropriate templates and categories need to be given to the files. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] ([[User talk:Drake Clawfang|talk]]) 22:54, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
== Shipping stubs ==
Hi Luna, I had a quick question for you. As you may know I'm not really even a shipper (when it comes to Pokémon at least), but nonetheless, I've come to believe that at least the most popular ships should still be documented for their history, impact on the fandom, canon references, etc. I think that for the shipping project to be taken seriously, many of the articles need a lot of improvement... (bad grammar, disorganized, lack of content, etc). While I personally think [[RocketShipping]] sets the example all the others should strive for, I appreciate that most ships haven't been around for as long, or the characters didn't interact as often, etc. So ultimately my point is - at what point is a shipping article no longer considered a stub? Having an idea of the criteria will help me clean up the articles, but it isn't really outlined on the {{bp|Project Shipping}} page. Thanks in advance! [[Special:Contributions/Zesty Cactus|--]][[User:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#006400">'''Zesty'''</span>]][[User talk:Zesty Cactus|<span style="color:#3CB371">'''Cactus'''</span>]] 03:34, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
25,688

edits