38,176
edits
Talk:Dawn (anime): Difference between revisions
m
Image update
m (→Dawn's coming back: redlink) |
m (Image update) |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
: That's Tauros droppings and you should know it. 30 seconds in a 22 minutes or so cartoon is nothing. it's a cameo at best. [[User:Cassius335|Cassius335]] 13:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | : That's Tauros droppings and you should know it. 30 seconds in a 22 minutes or so cartoon is nothing. it's a cameo at best. [[User:Cassius335|Cassius335]] 13:22, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Cassius335 is right. Only '''30 seconds'''. In a '''25 minutes''' cartoon? This is absollutely '''nothing'''. The episode was '''totally dedicated''' to Dawn, if you think a little more. -'''[[User:Haruka uzumaki|<span style="color:#705898">うずまき</span>]] [[User talk:Haruka uzumaki|<span style="color:#705898">ハルカ</span> | Cassius335 is right. Only '''30 seconds'''. In a '''25 minutes''' cartoon? This is absollutely '''nothing'''. The episode was '''totally dedicated''' to Dawn, if you think a little more. -'''[[User:Haruka uzumaki|<span style="color:#705898">うずまき</span>]] [[User talk:Haruka uzumaki|<span style="color:#705898">ハルカ</span>]]''' 17:52, 20 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
sigh... have it your way, but I should just say that Ash's appearance was definitely not a cameo considering that what happened during the 30 seconds was a major plotpoint. a cameo has to deal with an appearance of a person, place, or thing that has no bearing to the plot other than as an easter egg. Since Ash's appearance set the next 2 episodes in motion, It definitely wasn't a cameo. Besides, as I have stated before, even if it was just a cameo, It still Proves that the her debut episode was only primarily dedicated to herself. As I have stated before, If it truly was completely dedicated to her, Ash would Never have appeared AT ALL, not even as the 30-second appearance in the ending. but, it is your decision, now if anyone thinks my views should be followed, fine. if you think that my views are nothing more than, as you call it, Tauros droppings, fine, even if i feel that these statements you said are inaccurate. I thought the whole "Primarily dedicated" part would be more accurate than the "completely dedicated" since, while it is still more than what the other characters got, it is still a far cry from a completely dedicated debut. Now, Jimmy/Yoshi, Marina/Dani, And Vincent/Jackson's debut in "Legend of thunder" Is what I would call a Completely dedicated debut to those three considering that Ash never appeared AT ALL. but, as I said, It's your call. | sigh... have it your way, but I should just say that Ash's appearance was definitely not a cameo considering that what happened during the 30 seconds was a major plotpoint. a cameo has to deal with an appearance of a person, place, or thing that has no bearing to the plot other than as an easter egg. Since Ash's appearance set the next 2 episodes in motion, It definitely wasn't a cameo. Besides, as I have stated before, even if it was just a cameo, It still Proves that the her debut episode was only primarily dedicated to herself. As I have stated before, If it truly was completely dedicated to her, Ash would Never have appeared AT ALL, not even as the 30-second appearance in the ending. but, it is your decision, now if anyone thinks my views should be followed, fine. if you think that my views are nothing more than, as you call it, Tauros droppings, fine, even if i feel that these statements you said are inaccurate. I thought the whole "Primarily dedicated" part would be more accurate than the "completely dedicated" since, while it is still more than what the other characters got, it is still a far cry from a completely dedicated debut. Now, Jimmy/Yoshi, Marina/Dani, And Vincent/Jackson's debut in "Legend of thunder" Is what I would call a Completely dedicated debut to those three considering that Ash never appeared AT ALL. but, as I said, It's your call. | ||