2
edits
Bulbapedia talk:Project Fandom: Difference between revisions
→Pokefarm.org: new section
Force Fire (talk | contribs) |
(→Pokefarm.org: new section) |
||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
Hi everyone, is there a clear set of requirements for notability with regards to websites? An article I created, Pokemon Database was recently deleted for being non-notable, but it is one of the most popular fan sites in the world today. Several other fan site pages exist that don't seem remotely notable. Some seem to be called notable for being the biggest Pokemon fan site in France in 2003 (of course, an unverified claim). Can we have some basic guidelines? [[User:DisgruntledGoat|DisgruntledGoat]] 15:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | Hi everyone, is there a clear set of requirements for notability with regards to websites? An article I created, Pokemon Database was recently deleted for being non-notable, but it is one of the most popular fan sites in the world today. Several other fan site pages exist that don't seem remotely notable. Some seem to be called notable for being the biggest Pokemon fan site in France in 2003 (of course, an unverified claim). Can we have some basic guidelines? [[User:DisgruntledGoat|DisgruntledGoat]] 15:45, 23 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
== Pokefarm.org == | |||
This is a very notable site, with over 100,000 accounts on it. Is that enough for an article? I feel it is, but I'm not (yet) a part of this project, so I won't make it. [[User:Youngril|Youngril]] 00:18, 3 April 2012 (UTC) | |||