1,958
edits
User talk:Maverick Nate/Archives/8: Difference between revisions
User talk:Maverick Nate/Archives/8 (view source)
Revision as of 22:45, 12 December 2011
, 12 December 2011→Dragon Selection
Metalizard (talk | contribs) |
Metalizard (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 652: | Line 652: | ||
:::They is no confirmation that the Dragon type will be exclusively included in the set. You cannot say with 100% confirmation that any of the known Pokémon in that set will be Dragon type. Sure, it may be obvious some like Rayquaza will, but '''nothing has been confirmed'''. They may still have included the dual type Pokémon as the other types. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | :::They is no confirmation that the Dragon type will be exclusively included in the set. You cannot say with 100% confirmation that any of the known Pokémon in that set will be Dragon type. Sure, it may be obvious some like Rayquaza will, but '''nothing has been confirmed'''. They may still have included the dual type Pokémon as the other types. ''[[User:Maverick Nate|<sup style="color:#00008B;">'''Maverick'''</sup>]][[User talk:Maverick Nate|<sub style="color:#00008B;">'''Nate'''</sub>]]'' 22:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::I'm not saying every pokémon in the set will be Dragon-type (If they include Kingdra as dragon-type for example, of course the horsea and seadra won't be Dragon-type). Still, every pokémon that is at least part-Dragon will most likely be featured with the new Dragon-type because that's the focus of the set. It's not confirmed, but it's obvious. But whatever, I was just editing in advance. When the set gets out, we'll see... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ::::I'm not saying every pokémon in the set will be Dragon-type (If they include Kingdra as dragon-type for example, of course the horsea and seadra won't be Dragon-type). Still, every pokémon that is at least part-Dragon will most likely be featured with the new Dragon-type because that's the focus of the set. It's not confirmed, but it's obvious. But whatever, I was just editing in advance. When the set gets out, we'll see... [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:41, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
::::At least, the pure-dragon types could have the symbol next to them, nah? [[User:Metalizard|Metalizard]] 22:44, 12 December 2011 (UTC) | |||