Talk:Emboar (Pokémon): Difference between revisions

Talk:Emboar (Pokémon) (view source)

No change in size , 28 February 2011

167

edits

Revision as of 02:41, 28 February 2011 (view source) RedLuigi (talk \| contribs) (→‎Is Emboar a direct translation of Enbouh?: new section) ← Older edit		Revision as of 02:41, 28 February 2011 (view source) RedLuigi (talk \| contribs) (→‎Is Emboar a direct translation of Enbouh?) Newer edit →
Line 51:		Line 51:
	== Is Emboar a direct translation of Enbouh? ==		== Is Emboar a direct translation of Enbouh? ==

	Because I thought it was. This could be a good trivia addition and it could go something like "Emboar, {{p\|~~Megainum~~}}, and {{p\|Pikachu}} are the only starter Pokemon whose names are either direct or literal translations of their Japanese names." Like I said, if this is actually true, this could be good for a trivia addition, but if it's not, then we shouldn't add it in there. What do you guys think? [[User:RedLuigi\|RedLuigi]] 02:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)		Because I thought it was. This could be a good trivia addition and it could go something like "Emboar, {{p\|Meganium}}, and {{p\|Pikachu}} are the only starter Pokemon whose names are either direct or literal translations of their Japanese names." Like I said, if this is actually true, this could be good for a trivia addition, but if it's not, then we shouldn't add it in there. What do you guys think? [[User:RedLuigi\|RedLuigi]] 02:41, 28 February 2011 (UTC)