399
edits
User talk:Dennou Zenshi/2010: Difference between revisions
→Pokemon article summary: new section
No edit summary |
(→Pokemon article summary: new section) |
||
| Line 188: | Line 188: | ||
If you're sure they're in the wrong, don't be afraid to leave a reminder message on a user's talk page. Not everyone views the RC, so they mightn't see your reason in the edit summary: they could just assume that their edit didn't go through properly and this could lead to an edit war. Keep up the good work. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 07:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | If you're sure they're in the wrong, don't be afraid to leave a reminder message on a user's talk page. Not everyone views the RC, so they mightn't see your reason in the edit summary: they could just assume that their edit didn't go through properly and this could lead to an edit war. Keep up the good work. —'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 07:57, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Got it.----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 08:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | :Got it.----'''''無限の知性''''' ◎ [[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#BF0B17">ＤＥＮＮＯＵ</font>]]'''[[Special:Random|◆]]'''[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#1250A6">ＺＥＮＳＨＩ</font>]] 08:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Pokemon article summary == | |||
What's the big idea? I made a simple rephrasing of the original content, adding a few more details and a little "inside the world" point of view. The article of the Pokemon series is a very important one, basically introductory to what Pokemon is, and a common starting point of guests' reading. I don't get what you see wrong in the rephrasing, but would you please explain what you actually mind instead of treating me with a "what?". Furthermore, you can edit what you don't consider "encyclopedic language", instead of taking the easy way of merely reverting to the inferior previous version. Also, I need to make clear that I don't think I made a very significant improvement to the article, but I insist that the article has became more reader-friendly that way. I hope I don't sound unfriendly, but I'm honestly wondering about your choice, and I expect a dignified answer if I am to be convinced. [[User:Ash Pokemaster|Ash_Pokemaster]] 19:02, 5 December 2010 (UTC) | |||