Bulbapedia talk:Talk page policy: Difference between revisions

m
→‎New policy!: new section
m (moved User talk:The dark lord trombonator/Talk page policy to Bulbapedia talk:Talk page policy: This is nothing new: just an amalgamation of the two previous policies.)
m (→‎New policy!: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
==New policy!==
Actually, it's the same policies as before. Except we had two. So I merged them together.
* [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Bulbapedia:Talk_page&oldid=1143818 Old talk page policy]
* [http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Bulbapedia:Talk_abuse&oldid=1143820 Old talk abuse policy]
If there are problems with anything, bring them up here; the old talk pages are now archived ([[Bulbapedia talk:Talk page|1]], [[Bulbapedia talk:Talk abuse|2]]). &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 05:56, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
===Discussion from revamp s1===
Looks good. Maybe add a clarification that certain messages on user talk pages can be deleted. You have one section saying that abusive messages can be removed by any user, and the next saying don't delete any comments. Obviously the meaning as-is is that they can't remove any comments not fitting in the above category, but some users could probably use clarifiaction. You'd hope it wasn't needed, but maybe there should also be something on what is and isn't abusive. Some users could try and abuse that loophole to remove anything they don't agree with.  
Looks good. Maybe add a clarification that certain messages on user talk pages can be deleted. You have one section saying that abusive messages can be removed by any user, and the next saying don't delete any comments. Obviously the meaning as-is is that they can't remove any comments not fitting in the above category, but some users could probably use clarifiaction. You'd hope it wasn't needed, but maybe there should also be something on what is and isn't abusive. Some users could try and abuse that loophole to remove anything they don't agree with.  


Line 7: Line 14:
Thank you all for your feedback. No idea how I forgot the signature. Keep the responses coming. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 11:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Thank you all for your feedback. No idea how I forgot the signature. Keep the responses coming. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 11:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)


== Resigning posts ==
===Resigning posts (discussion from revamp s2)===


Don't see anything about going back to edit talk pages just to sign them and having them give the wrong timestamp - all I see is instructions on using the <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> template. It's even on the current article on the signature policy. Either I'm missing it or it shouldn't be there. [[User:Ztobor|Ztobor]] 04:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Don't see anything about going back to edit talk pages just to sign them and having them give the wrong timestamp - all I see is instructions on using the <nowiki>{{unsigned}}</nowiki> template. It's even on the current article on the signature policy. Either I'm missing it or it shouldn't be there. [[User:Ztobor|Ztobor]] 04:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
:Nope, that's how it should be. Thanks. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 11:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
:Nope, that's how it should be. Thanks. &mdash;'''<span style="font-family:Verdana"><span style="color:#000">darklord</span>[[User talk:The dark lord trombonator|<span style="color:#0047AB">trom</span>]]</span>''' 11:18, 1 September 2010 (UTC)