869
edits
Talk:Pokémon movie: Difference between revisions
→Canon, again: keep it. Weak wording and is a neutral coverage of the argument.
(→Canon, again: new section) |
Beligaronia (talk | contribs) (→Canon, again: keep it. Weak wording and is a neutral coverage of the argument.) |
||
| Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Seriously. Who doesn't think the movies are canon? Is there '''''anyone''''' out there? '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 07:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | Seriously. Who doesn't think the movies are canon? Is there '''''anyone''''' out there? '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#FF0000">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|chidna]]''' 07:21, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
:To my mind the wording is fairly weak so it's kind of a non-issue. Someone wrote the section in the first place therefore there is someone out there who doesn't believe or doubts that they are canon thus it should remain. Also we are not here to pass down rulings on truth unless there has been any official confirmation one way or another. So it should remain as it is, a neutral account of a fandom argument representing both sides equally allowing readers and fans to come to their own conclusions. My two cents, refunds available.--[[User:Beligaronia|Beligaronia]] ([[User talk:Beligaronia|talk]]) 07:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC) | |||