74,011
edits
User talk:Ht14/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
m
→TCG resistances
m (relink) |
|||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
Alright then. I don't recall it, though, so would you provide me with a link to the discussion in which that was decided? --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 01:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | Alright then. I don't recall it, though, so would you provide me with a link to the discussion in which that was decided? --[[User:Politoed666|<span style="color:#30D5C8">ニョロトノ</span>]][[User talk:Politoed666|<span style="color:#FF69B4">''666''</span>]] 01:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
:[[Bulbapedia talk:Project | :[[Bulbapedia talk:Project TCG#Resistances]] was where a discussion was, another was in one of Shiningpikablu's archives, and a third is on User:Drapion's talk page. The reason I say that it should be there is because many people do not know that the resistance is -30. I personally did not know until this issue was brought up, and if someone so involved in the TCG didn't know, others are bound to not know either. Also, the "-30" is on the card and is considered card text, one of the points of the card pages is to have all the card text, not just some of it. The fact that the resistance number changed overtime is ever more reason to not the "-30". And lastly, my final argument is for consistancy. It is on so many cards now that it would be easier to just to add the rest them to remove them all, if they are all added, than this issue won't ever be brought up again. And, Politoed666, you seem to be the only one against it. I'm for it, Drapion and Ht14 are with it because they wouldn't have started adding it if they didn't believe -30 should be there, and Shiningpikablu doesn't care either way. I hope I convinced you, I ran out of arguements. ''[[User:Moldy orange|<sup style="color:#4B5320;">'''Moldy'''</sup>]][[User talk:Moldy orange|<sub style="color:#ED9121;">'''Orange'''</sub>]]'' 02:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||
::The final problem though is that the weakness, though it's 2x, is not shown on the card as it was explained in the manual. What should we do then? {{u|Ht14}} 02:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ::The final problem though is that the weakness, though it's 2x, is not shown on the card as it was explained in the manual. What should we do then? {{u|Ht14}} 02:09, 18 September 2008 (UTC) | ||