5,655
edits
User talk:TTEchidna/Archive Jan-Mar 10: Difference between revisions
User talk:TTEchidna/Archive Jan-Mar 10 (view source)
Revision as of 17:43, 14 February 2010
, 14 February 2010→Border-radius workaround?
m (showing TTE what a new messages bar looks like.) |
|||
| Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
As you know well, we use moz-border-radius, despite {{tt|WebKit|Safari and Chrome}} and {{tt|Presto|Opera browsers}} having their respective specifications. I'm also pretty sure that the problems will be solved when border-radius becomes a web standard. However, I think I might discovered a workaround [http://home.e-tjenesten.org/~ato/2009/08/border-radius-opera here]. I don't understand PHP so I can't say nothing about the subject but is there something that could be applied on our sites? [[User:Pokemon lover|Pokemon lover]] 21:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | As you know well, we use moz-border-radius, despite {{tt|WebKit|Safari and Chrome}} and {{tt|Presto|Opera browsers}} having their respective specifications. I'm also pretty sure that the problems will be solved when border-radius becomes a web standard. However, I think I might discovered a workaround [http://home.e-tjenesten.org/~ato/2009/08/border-radius-opera here]. I don't understand PHP so I can't say nothing about the subject but is there something that could be applied on our sites? [[User:Pokemon lover|Pokemon lover]] 21:58, 25 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
:That's for the site's CSS. Templates... not so much. It appears to work pretty much the same, but to actually have it work on Safari, Chrome, and Opera, that'd be a hell of a lot of extra code to put in on ''every instance'' of -moz-border-radius, let alone for the things that only have one or two corners rounded, such as table cells. And considering there's still nothing for that crapsack of a web browser, IE, I think we can put this on the back burner until there's a way to activate roundycorners in every browser with ''one'' codecall, rather than three to activate it in four browsers. A majority of our users use Firefox anyway, and the templates look just fine in IE and other browsers even without the roundy, so don't worry about it. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#80964B">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C4E673">chidna</span>]]''' 00:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | :That's for the site's CSS. Templates... not so much. It appears to work pretty much the same, but to actually have it work on Safari, Chrome, and Opera, that'd be a hell of a lot of extra code to put in on ''every instance'' of -moz-border-radius, let alone for the things that only have one or two corners rounded, such as table cells. And considering there's still nothing for that crapsack of a web browser, IE, I think we can put this on the back burner until there's a way to activate roundycorners in every browser with ''one'' codecall, rather than three to activate it in four browsers. A majority of our users use Firefox anyway, and the templates look just fine in IE and other browsers even without the roundy, so don't worry about it. '''[[User:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#80964B">''TTE''</span>]][[User talk:TTEchidna|<span style="color:#C4E673">chidna</span>]]''' 00:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Too late for an answer, I know. At least, I understood somewhat better the reasons and hope that it becomes a standard the soonest possible because even though {{tt|I haven't been using Firefox for a while now|mainly Chrome because Opera 10.50 is beta}}, I miss the roundy corners. Fortunately, both Chrome and Opera (likely Safari as well) support them to an extent already, even here on the 'Pedia, so it's a good sign. [[User:Pokemon lover|Pokemon lover]] 17:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
== New Psybeam Pic == | == New Psybeam Pic == | ||