Category name is conjectural?
So while I was hunting for official names for the Legendary Beasts, I bumped into some set descriptions for some DP sets with this "held items" mechanic. The relevant areas are reproduced below. Bolding is added by me for emphasis.
Mysterious Treasures: " In addition to some great new gameplay options like Pokémon with Berries, new Fossils, and more powerful Pokémon LV.X," "Amazing Pokémon with Berry for more gameplay choices" [1]
Secret Wonders: "This expansion introduces "items" for the first time. Items are part of the Pokémon’s card, giving that Pokémon a unique distinction. Murkrow's (95/132) Dusk Stone allows it to immediately evolve into Honchkrow (132/132) during any of your turns—including the very first turn of the game! So, what other Pokémon have items? Find out in booster packs of Secret Wonders!" [2]
So, are we technically incorrect in calling all of these "held items" when official text says "item" or "Berry"? (No, there isn't confusion with Item cards here, those only get introduced three series later, and were never in the same set as this mechanic.) Should we instead call this category "Pokémon cards with items"? Should we split off a new category for "Pokémon cards with Berries" since there isn't an umbrella term and Secret Wonders own description insists that "items" are a wholly new concept? Salmancer (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Oh right, I guess I need a position. Uh, move to "Pokémon cards with items". There seems to be just enough members of each for a split, with Berry either being a subcaetgory of items or both items and berries being a subcategory of something, but I don't care strongly enough to push for it. Items, of course, is broad enough to hold everything. Salmancer (talk) 20:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)