30,365
edits
User talk:TehPerson: Difference between revisions
→List of Battle Maison Trainers
Tiddlywinks (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
: Oh, thanks for catching those errors! Sometimes my speadsheet bugs up a bit on me :\ [[User:TehPerson|TehPerson]] ([[User talk:TehPerson|talk]]) 04:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | : Oh, thanks for catching those errors! Sometimes my speadsheet bugs up a bit on me :\ [[User:TehPerson|TehPerson]] ([[User talk:TehPerson|talk]]) 04:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
: I've come to realize that categorizing the Pokemon isn't the best way to represent Trainer teams. Might as well just do a table for each. [[User:TehPerson|TehPerson]] ([[User talk:TehPerson|talk]]) 07:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | : I've come to realize that categorizing the Pokemon isn't the best way to represent Trainer teams. Might as well just do a table for each. [[User:TehPerson|TehPerson]] ([[User talk:TehPerson|talk]]) 07:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | ||
::I'm just a bit torn about that. Between the two options, I kind of barely favor your new approach. | |||
::The original approach requires a lot of user action to figure out what they want to know. Compared to the new approach, the only thing it's especially useful for is if people want to know the whole list to remix the Trainers' rosters for a game hack. The problem with the new approach, though, is that it can be incredibly repetitive. I mean, you've got tables for Groups A/B and C/D, but then also B/C which overlaps half of each of those, and then type groups which overlap again... The complete straightforwardness of it is the narrowest deciding factor for me. [[User:Tiddlywinks|Tiddlywinks]] ([[User talk:Tiddlywinks|talk]]) 14:58, 21 April 2016 (UTC) | |||
== Talk page responses == | == Talk page responses == | ||