171
edits
User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/5: Difference between revisions
→Idea
(→Idea: new section) |
(→Idea) |
||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
I've got a huge idea. Since there are problems with the types I suggest to be made a separate template for types without the dash. And I think we should make use of the <nowiki>{{type}}</nowiki>, therefore a <nowiki>{{type|Fire}}</nowiki> would be Fire type and <nowiki>{{type2|Fire}}</nowiki> would be Fire-type ? Plus, regardless of what you do if you write <nowiki>{{type2|Fire|Fire type}}</nowiki> it still adds the dash. How about it ? --[[User:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">--'''DJ'''</span>]][[User talk:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">'''Wolfy'''</span>]] 19:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC) | I've got a huge idea. Since there are problems with the types I suggest to be made a separate template for types without the dash. And I think we should make use of the <nowiki>{{type}}</nowiki>, therefore a <nowiki>{{type|Fire}}</nowiki> would be Fire type and <nowiki>{{type2|Fire}}</nowiki> would be Fire-type ? Plus, regardless of what you do if you write <nowiki>{{type2|Fire|Fire type}}</nowiki> it still adds the dash. How about it ? --[[User:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">--'''DJ'''</span>]][[User talk:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">'''Wolfy'''</span>]] 19:52, 27 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
I'm not sure if i understand u correctly,but why do we need a new template? Can't we use the <nowiki>{{t}}</nowiki> template? [[User:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:green">'''Auraguardian'''</span>]][[User talk:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:red">'''197'''</span>]] 17:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC) | |||