User talk:SnorlaxMonster/Archive/5: Difference between revisions

Line 167: Line 167:


Oh,now i get it. But there's still one thing i don't understand. Can't we just use type2 for that? I'm just asking,that's all. I'm still new here so just don't take me too seriously ;-) [[User:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:green">'''Auraguardian'''</span>]][[User talk:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:red">'''197'''</span>]] 18:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Oh,now i get it. But there's still one thing i don't understand. Can't we just use type2 for that? I'm just asking,that's all. I'm still new here so just don't take me too seriously ;-) [[User:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:green">'''Auraguardian'''</span>]][[User talk:Auraguardian197|<span style="color:red">'''197'''</span>]] 18:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
::Because "Charizard is a Fire type" refers to a complement". Therefore, Charizard is a what ? (a Fire type). The dash applies to adjectives. Therefore, Charizard is a {{type2|Fire}} Pokémon. This refers to an adjective. It answers to the question: What kind of Pokémon is Charizard ? Take a look {{u|SnorlaxMonster/Pokémon Syntax|here}}, it's almost an official policy.--[[User:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">--'''DJ'''</span>]][[User talk:DJWolfy|<span style="color:Blue;">'''Wolfy'''</span>]] 18:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
13,113

edits