User talk:Kogoro/2: Difference between revisions

Line 434: Line 434:
# Edit warring is bad. If your comments gets removed by {{u|Kenji-girl|a sysop}} you should '''ask''' that sysop why they removed it. Don't restore it with a jerkish edit summary, kay?
# Edit warring is bad. If your comments gets removed by {{u|Kenji-girl|a sysop}} you should '''ask''' that sysop why they removed it. Don't restore it with a jerkish edit summary, kay?
:- [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''<sc>Kogoro</sc>'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''<sc>Talk to me</sc>'''</span>]] - 04:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
:- [[User:Kogoro|<span style="color:#DA70D6;">'''<sc>Kogoro</sc>'''</span>]] '''|''' [[User talk:Kogoro|<span style="color:#FFB6C1;">'''<sc>Talk to me</sc>'''</span>]] - 04:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
1. Where was the opinion? That incest and pedophilia are wrong is an opinion?
And I didn't say "Remove these shippings right away". I asked why we must list shippings that promote taboo practices. Last time I checked, asking the logic in including something in an article is a valid comment.
2. I ask again. What rule did I break? After reading that, I still fail to see what I did that goes against that page's rules. I didn't attack anyone, edit someone else's comment, left my comment unsigned, or made an article-unrelated comment.
3. Okay. I fail to see how writing "You don't help the article" as the reason for editing the comment I wrote asking a question, without telling me what I did wrong, is any less of a "jerkish edit summary" than was my answer to the edit, though.
- [[User:Spideym|Spideym]] 05:37, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
93

edits