11,901
edits
User talk:Dennou Zenshi: Difference between revisions
→Type effectiveness
Nescientist (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 407: | Line 407: | ||
My goal is to reduce what information is presented at "damage" to a bare minimum (basically, that's the bullet point and a link), to have "type" still display the current type chart and the idea (because type interaction is an essential part of "type"), and to have all the details somewhere else. And I think a really good solution is to have a page on type effectiveness that combines what is now spread across those pages (''roughly'' similar to {{STAB}}), and is linked to from both "type" (via {{template|main}}) and "damage" (pretty much how it's done already, except the info wouldn't be "detailed below"). Would/could you approve that? (Also, me posting this here should in no way deter SnorlaxMonster or really anyone else from chiming in if desired.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 11:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | My goal is to reduce what information is presented at "damage" to a bare minimum (basically, that's the bullet point and a link), to have "type" still display the current type chart and the idea (because type interaction is an essential part of "type"), and to have all the details somewhere else. And I think a really good solution is to have a page on type effectiveness that combines what is now spread across those pages (''roughly'' similar to {{STAB}}), and is linked to from both "type" (via {{template|main}}) and "damage" (pretty much how it's done already, except the info wouldn't be "detailed below"). Would/could you approve that? (Also, me posting this here should in no way deter SnorlaxMonster or really anyone else from chiming in if desired.) [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 11:33, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
:All of your propositions make more or less sense to me. The "Type effectiveness" section at [[damage]] indeed looks out of place and I'm for removing it. However (albeit not a bad idea), rather than having a page named "Type effectiveness" for detailed information about super-effectiveness etc. and all type charts, I think all that information would also fit into the [[type]] article just fine. And if old type charts make the article seem too long, they could be put under a show/hide button.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 15:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | :All of your propositions make more or less sense to me. The "Type effectiveness" section at [[damage]] indeed looks out of place and I'm for removing it. However (albeit not a bad idea), rather than having a page named "Type effectiveness" for detailed information about super-effectiveness etc. and all type charts, I think all that information would also fit into the [[type]] article just fine. And if old type charts make the article seem too long, they could be put under a show/hide button.--'''[[User:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#AB0909">電</font><font color="#063A73">禅</font>]]<small>[[User talk:Dennou Zenshi|<font color="#fff" face="Tahoma"><span style="text-shadow:#000 0.2em 0.1em 0.1em; class=texhtml">Den Zen</span></font>]]</small>''' 15:17, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
::Thanks for your help, that'd be a great solution as well! Actually, I had assumed there was a solid reason why it was initially subpaged (article size etc.), but [[Special:LongPages|as that doesn't seem to be the case]], sure. (The only downside I still see is that I guess show/hide buttons don't work without Javascript, and it's not the bottom of the page in this case.) | |||
::May I propose you take care of merging the two "type"s then (since I lack your powers), and I'll take care of what's at damage thereafter? [[User:Nescientist|Nescientist]] ([[User talk:Nescientist|talk]]) 17:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC) | |||