User talk:Darthrai: Difference between revisions

m (Reason for the block has now been given.)
Line 46: Line 46:


Alright, another long overdue message, I apologize to you too. Maybe you didn't mean it, but what you did there is called an '''edit war''', and they are frowned upon in every wiki. For that to happen, at least two parties must engage in a reversion tango, A reverts B, B retaliates by reverting A's revertion, and so on at least three times ([http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Signature_move&action=history example]), after of which the page gets protected and both parties are blocked for a number of days {{bp|Blocking policy#Threats_and_edit/revert_wars|depending on the amount of reversions}}, in this case, a full week. These disputes are better resolved in the talk page (and when I say this, I mean that you should wait until you can reach an agreement with the "offending" party so you can peacefully edit, successfully avoiding a war). I hope you can take this week as a minor stepback if you're serious as a Bulbapedia editor and take some time off to either cool down, or read the policies so you have a better grasp of Bulbapedia's functionality as a wiki and avoid further problems. Thank you and have a good day. [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 05:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Alright, another long overdue message, I apologize to you too. Maybe you didn't mean it, but what you did there is called an '''edit war''', and they are frowned upon in every wiki. For that to happen, at least two parties must engage in a reversion tango, A reverts B, B retaliates by reverting A's revertion, and so on at least three times ([http://bulbapedia.bulbagarden.net/w/index.php?title=Signature_move&action=history example]), after of which the page gets protected and both parties are blocked for a number of days {{bp|Blocking policy#Threats_and_edit/revert_wars|depending on the amount of reversions}}, in this case, a full week. These disputes are better resolved in the talk page (and when I say this, I mean that you should wait until you can reach an agreement with the "offending" party so you can peacefully edit, successfully avoiding a war). I hope you can take this week as a minor stepback if you're serious as a Bulbapedia editor and take some time off to either cool down, or read the policies so you have a better grasp of Bulbapedia's functionality as a wiki and avoid further problems. Thank you and have a good day. [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 05:33, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
== [[talk:Hydreigon_(Pokémon)#Mention_of_King_Ghidorah.3F|Re: Mention of King Ghidorah?]] ==
This is kinda a "{{tt|way-over-a-month-late|like 3 months late?!}}" response to the [[talk:Hydreigon_(Pokémon)#Mention_of_King_Ghidorah.3F|"Mention of King Ghidorah?" topic]] you made. But [[Hydreigon (Pokémon)#Origin|to quote a part of his origin section about Ken Sugimori ideas when designing it]], "Hydreigon was drawn with a fewer number of heads in order to appear less confusing."  So my guess is, while it ''might'' have helped inspire the design, it wasn't the actual intent that it had three heads ''because of'' King Ghidorah.  So basically, despite the daikaiju's "popularity" in Japan or even the fact that in {{tt|GMK|Godzilla, Mothra, King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All Out Attack}} it was supposed to be an immature Orochi, I think it is more of a coincidence that they both have three heads and personally don't think it needs to be mentioned. ----[[User:NateVirus|<span style="color:blue">NateVirus</span>]]<small>''([[User talk:NateVirus|<span style="color:green">Talk</span>]]''|''[[Special:Contributions/NateVirus|<span style="color:red">Contributions</span>]]''</small>) 19:47, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
677

edits