5,386
edits
User talk:ArcToraphim/Archive2: Difference between revisions
→Ghost (type) trivia rewording + Nixtorm reversion
ArcToraphim (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 576: | Line 576: | ||
:::I got the latter from you. If it's the former, let's call it what it is, since ultimately the reference to Knights isn't unique to Ghosts alone. "Ghost-type Pokémon which are not part-Flying or have Levitate are capable of physically passing through enemies, referencing the common belief ghosts in real life can pass through tangible objects. They cannot, however, in-game pass through with any other obstacle on the field." [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 17:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC) | :::I got the latter from you. If it's the former, let's call it what it is, since ultimately the reference to Knights isn't unique to Ghosts alone. "Ghost-type Pokémon which are not part-Flying or have Levitate are capable of physically passing through enemies, referencing the common belief ghosts in real life can pass through tangible objects. They cannot, however, in-game pass through with any other obstacle on the field." [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 17:08, 13 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::And I apologize this reply took so long. [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 17:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC) | ::::And I apologize this reply took so long. [[User:ArcToraphim|Luna Tiger]] * the [[User talk:ArcToraphim|Arc]] [[Special:Contributions/ArcToraphim|Toraph]] 17:09, 13 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::::I figured it would be best to mention the similar property displayed by Flying types and Pokémon with Levitate to avoid confusion. My initial wording was misleading, yours I interpret as a partially empty statement of (I repeat) "Ghost types have this property regardless of types or Abilities. This property allows them further freedom of movement.", and it does not state the resemblance. My point gets lost because other types have certain movement properties as well, you say? When adding the information, it seemed clear to me that the movement properties displayed by types other than the Ghost type are self-explanatory and not worth noting as trivia points. They are mentioned in the Battlefied sections of kingdom articles anyway. This one was curious and more noteworthy, in that it does not resemble any main series property or concern tiles that are practically the type of the allowed species. The focus is, of course, the curious movement property, while the chess analogy is simply included to easily aid readers that are not familiar with Pokémon Conquest. You really think that every other movement property needs to be noted if this one should? You don't think this one is more notable? Either way, if that's what you want, just remove the point (or add every other in their respective articles). I think you can make it work via rewording, though, and if the chess analogy is what's keeping you from making sense of the trivia point, then cut it. Similarly, if you'd rather focus on/explain via the animation of passing through, then do that, since the point remains the same. The only reason I wrote you is because your new wording makes no sense to me and appears to misunderstand my initial wording (as described above), so it needs to be fixed, which I believe you'll do now, meaning we're done. Thank you! [[User:Yvnr|Yvnr]] ([[User talk:Yvnr|talk]]) 08:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Must discuss 団s meaning before editing == | == Must discuss 団s meaning before editing == | ||