6
edits
Talk:Zekrom (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Dragon/Electric type!
Fabu-Vinny (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::::Well I suppose that much checks out...we should definitely hold off on making that a part of the article, though.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 05:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ::::Well I suppose that much checks out...we should definitely hold off on making that a part of the article, though.—[[User:Urutapu|Ｌｏｖｅはドコ？]] ([[User talk:Urutapu|talk]] <small>•</small> [[Special:Contributions/Urutapu|contribs]]) 05:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::::Any mention of the electric type should stay away from the bulk of the article but I still say it counts as trivia. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 14:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | :::::Any mention of the electric type should stay away from the bulk of the article but I still say it counts as trivia. --[[User:Fabu-Vinny|FabuVinny]] <sup>|[[User talk:Fabu-Vinny|Talk Page]]|</sup> 14:04, 2 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
The thought of that part of the blog being removed instead of changed leads me to believe that it was a leak instead of an error, as the error would most likely be fixed instead. Also, is it really better to count it soley as a dragon and not a Dragon/Unconfirmed, since ??? is considered a type?--[[User:Jmassacre|Jmassacre]] 13:18, 5 June 2010 (UTC) | |||