8,480
edits
Talk:Yveltal (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
m
Replies x2 (Part II).
Igor Rowan (talk | contribs) (→Redirect: new section) |
m (Replies x2 (Part II).) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think [http://www.joystiq.com/2013/01/09/pokemon-x-y-legendary-details-meet-xerneas-and-yveltal/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fjoystiq+%28Joystiq%29 we have enough] to go ahead and kick off the two legendary Pokémon pages. (Other being Xerneas.) [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 15:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | I think [http://www.joystiq.com/2013/01/09/pokemon-x-y-legendary-details-meet-xerneas-and-yveltal/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+weblogsinc%2Fjoystiq+%28Joystiq%29 we have enough] to go ahead and kick off the two legendary Pokémon pages. (Other being Xerneas.) [[User:CycloneGU|CycloneGU]] ([[User talk:CycloneGU|talk]]) 15:13, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:Because we don't know the types these Pokémon will have yet, we will be holding back the creation of their articles for now. Knowing the type of a Pokémon is basic information, but a relevant one when creating an article (mainly because of {{template|PokémonInfobox}}). [[User:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #224a9a"><b><span style="color: #2b5fc7">M</span>asatoshi</b></span>]][[User_talk:Masatoshi|<span style="color: #118eb2"><sub><small>''talk''</small></sub></span>]] 16:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
== Redirect == | == Redirect == | ||
Before the pages get ready, can I make the redirect pages already? the ones with pokemon instead of Pokémon, e.g. Xerneas (pokemon) redirect to Xerneas (Pokémon).--[[User:Igor Castro Chucre|Igor ]] ([[User talk:Igor Castro Chucre|talk]]) 16:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | Before the pages get ready, can I make the redirect pages already? the ones with pokemon instead of Pokémon, e.g. Xerneas (pokemon) redirect to Xerneas (Pokémon).--[[User:Igor Castro Chucre|Igor ]] ([[User talk:Igor Castro Chucre|talk]]) 16:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
:I personally see barely any point in creating redirects to an inexistent article. It will create false positives shown in the search bar, misleading a lot of people. I suggest you to wait until we actually ''create'' the article. | |||