230
edits
Talk:Type: Difference between revisions
→Intro
(→Index numbers: new section) |
(→Intro) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The Bird & ??? types== | |||
I added Bird and ??? type to the template. Although they are not really conventional types. I do think they should be included, maybe you should seperate them a little? I really can't get my head round metawiki's silly table formatting code. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 21:26, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) | I added Bird and ??? type to the template. Although they are not really conventional types. I do think they should be included, maybe you should seperate them a little? I really can't get my head round metawiki's silly table formatting code. - [[User:Ferret|Ferret]] 21:26, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) | ||
| Line 28: | Line 30: | ||
The ??? type DOES have a Pokémon to represent it.*cough*Arceus*cough*--[[User:Frostagin|Frostagin]] 18:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC) | The ??? type DOES have a Pokémon to represent it.*cough*Arceus*cough*--[[User:Frostagin|Frostagin]] 18:51, 15 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
Several people here have expressed (to greater or lesser degrees) that they think there should only be said to be a total of 17 types as they believe the ???-type isn't really a type. However, this wiki should really be based more on the fact (as opposed to people's beliefs) and the fact is ??? appears in the type category for pokémon eggs in gen III. It also has a move and Arceus can technically turn into it. Does that not make it a type? What else does it really need? | |||
Therefore, based on all the evidence before us I reckon the page should state there are 18 types to include ???. Does anyone have any problems with that? [[User:Wikid|Wikid]] 00:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
== Disambig? == | == Disambig? == | ||