494
edits
(→Remove Keldeo from the article: new section) |
|||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
Hm... Musketeers doesn't make much sense unless you know the origin, and even then Keldeo doesn't really count, even though it's definitely a counterpart. On the other hand, ungulates is very vague and lame; what would we do if another trio were based on ungulates? We'd have another "Dragon Trio" on our hands. I would lean toward Legendary Musketeers: it's not perfect, but it's the best I can think of. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] 14:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC) | Hm... Musketeers doesn't make much sense unless you know the origin, and even then Keldeo doesn't really count, even though it's definitely a counterpart. On the other hand, ungulates is very vague and lame; what would we do if another trio were based on ungulates? We'd have another "Dragon Trio" on our hands. I would lean toward Legendary Musketeers: it's not perfect, but it's the best I can think of. --[[User:AndyPKMN|Andy<sup>P</sup><sub>K</sub><sup>M</sup><sub>N</sub>]] 14:33, 22 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
== Remove Keldeo from the article == | |||
Just because it's another Fighting legendary doesn't mean the trio is a quartet. Besides, it's not confirmed. [[User:Bwburke94|Bwburke94]] 16:54, 27 October 2010 (UTC) |
edits