Talk:Side series: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 37: Line 37:


::Yes, but the current definition would also accept games like Ranger and Channel. We need a new definition if we are going to exclude games like these. [[User:CyberDragonM|CyberDragonM]] ([[User talk:CyberDragonM|talk]]) 06:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
::Yes, but the current definition would also accept games like Ranger and Channel. We need a new definition if we are going to exclude games like these. [[User:CyberDragonM|CyberDragonM]] ([[User talk:CyberDragonM|talk]]) 06:27, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, it's true that Ranger and Channel fit the current definition given in the intro of the "side series" article. The intro even mentions that side series games "allow for other kinds of rewards or bonuses" which is the case for Ranger and Channel.
:::Here's one possible idea: Maybe we could agree to change this definition and consider that Ranger and Channel are not side series games because their connection to the side series is merely limited to special one-of-a-kind rewards.
:::If we transfer Jirachi from Channel (which appears doable only once per Ruby/Sapphire save file and requires beating the Elite Four in the current save) or Manaphy from Ranger (which appears doable only once per Ranger game card regardless of deleting the save data from Ranger or DPPt/HGSS), then there's basically nothing else to do from Ranger or Channel in relation to the core series games. --[[User:Daniel Carrero|Daniel Carrero]] ([[User talk:Daniel Carrero|talk]]) 06:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC)