Still a stub?

Power is a stub that needs to be rectified. However, I think that it has gone beyond stub status. Does anyone agree? - unsigned comment from Samjohn95 (talkcontribs)

Yeah, this is surely not a atub. Alpha CuboneKing 01:01, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, I think I should remove the stub status. I have seen a lot smaller articles - and ones with less info - be non-stub. Samjohn95 01:04, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Only admins can remove stub status... Alpha CuboneKing 01:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Grammer error, I meant "it should be removed of". Samjohn95 01:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Changed "Type effectiveness"

The example was unsatisfactory, as Silver Wind would give STAB with Buterfree, a component not covered until later in the article. --Zeebra403 (talk) 04:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


I'm not sure about this, but I feel like there should be some way to make a power to actual damage dealt comparison. I know the amount of variables far exceeds that of what can be explained, but I, personally, have always wanted to know exactly how those two relate to each other. - unsigned comment from 8BitRevenge (talkcontribs)

Return to "Power" page.