91
edits
Talk:Phione (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
→Legendary Status
| Line 340: | Line 340: | ||
It's not circumstantial; it's from an official first-party source; and the "evidence against" column consists of circumstantial evidence from a spin-off, a third-party source, and a statement based on a fan-assumed definition of legendary Pokémon. Oh, and there's quite a lot of circumstantial evidence to back up that it is legendary/mythical. [[User:Seafarer|Seafarer]] ([[User talk:Seafarer|talk]]) 22:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC) | It's not circumstantial; it's from an official first-party source; and the "evidence against" column consists of circumstantial evidence from a spin-off, a third-party source, and a statement based on a fan-assumed definition of legendary Pokémon. Oh, and there's quite a lot of circumstantial evidence to back up that it is legendary/mythical. [[User:Seafarer|Seafarer]] ([[User talk:Seafarer|talk]]) 22:59, 9 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
:In the TPC survey, Phione is not mentioned in the list of Mythical Pokémon. [[User:Shepeedy|Shepeedy]] ([[User talk:Shepeedy|talk]]) 20:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC) | :In the TPC survey, Phione is not mentioned in the list of Mythical Pokémon. [[User:Shepeedy|Shepeedy]] ([[User talk:Shepeedy|talk]]) 20:17, 14 July 2015 (UTC) | ||
::That's circumstantial - it doesn't make a valid argument that Phione isn't Mythical. Of course, between that and the fact that it's needed for X/Y's diploma, there's a strong argument that it isn't Mythical anymore. However, that's not my point. I'm not trying to say that Phione is specifically one or the other; rather, I'm saying that there's now first-party non-circumstantial evidence that it enjoys one of the two designations. [[User:Seafarer|Seafarer]] ([[User talk:Seafarer|talk]]) 20:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC) | |||