editlock-exempt
28,544
edits
Talk:Mismagius (Pokémon): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Mismagius doesn't really look very feminine to me. Not like Misdreavus does. Wouldn't that piece of trivia be more accurate in the Misdreavus article? [[User:Buddy Christ|Buddy Christ]] | Mismagius doesn't really look very feminine to me. Not like Misdreavus does. Wouldn't that piece of trivia be more accurate in the Misdreavus article? [[User:Buddy Christ|Buddy Christ]] | ||
: Not entirely; while it may not look feminine to you, it certainly does to others. It's like saying Honchrow isn't overtly masculine despite being based on a mafia godfather. I'm not here to start a petty edit-war (too late), I just think it's appropriate for the trivia section. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | : Not entirely; while it may not look feminine to you, it certainly does to others. It's like saying Honchrow isn't overtly masculine despite being based on a mafia godfather. I'm not here to start a petty edit-war (too late), I just think it's appropriate for the trivia section. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Opinionated. Gardevoir is an exception. It most certainly DOES look like a woman, but Mismagius can go either way.[[User:Totodilesentret| | ::Opinionated. Gardevoir is an exception. It most certainly DOES look like a woman, but Mismagius can go either way.[[User:Totodilesentret|<font color="blue">Totodile</font><font color="brown">sentret!</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Totodilesentret|<font color="gold">Talk to me.</font>]]</sup> 15:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::: What is above me is also an opinion, and Gardevoir can be seen as a masculine creature if the beholder wishes. My entire point is that this IS trivial, just a little quirk that's worth mentioning, especially now considering the circumstances. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ::: What is above me is also an opinion, and Gardevoir can be seen as a masculine creature if the beholder wishes. My entire point is that this IS trivial, just a little quirk that's worth mentioning, especially now considering the circumstances. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 15:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::Just for the record, there is a proper term for a male witch. They're typically called "warlocks". --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ::::Just for the record, there is a proper term for a male witch. They're typically called "warlocks". --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] 17:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Actually, warlocks were typically more experienced, male witches. Males could be plain old witches too. Has ANYBODY here heard of the Salem Witch Trials?[[User:Totodilesentret| | :::::Actually, warlocks were typically more experienced, male witches. Males could be plain old witches too. Has ANYBODY here heard of the Salem Witch Trials?[[User:Totodilesentret|<font color="blue">Totodile</font><font color="brown">sentret!</font>]]<sup>[[User Talk:Totodilesentret|<font color="gold">Talk to me.</font>]]</sup> 17:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
::::::I'm going to skip the opinion part of this war and just ask an honest question: Why does the idea of Mismagius being cosidred femanine disturb you so much? It's nothing more than simple trivia. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 17:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ::::::I'm going to skip the opinion part of this war and just ask an honest question: Why does the idea of Mismagius being cosidred femanine disturb you so much? It's nothing more than simple trivia. [[User:Fossilgojira|Fossilgojira]] 17:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:Ending this. Now. Nobody cares if it looks masculine or feminine. That is NOT what users come to the page to find out. Instead of being very counterproductive, and trying to backseat-mod each other, direct your focus to any of the articles on this site that need work that DO NOT relate to what a Pokemon looks like. And honestly, this is coming from ME, a 21 year old guy who doesn't play Pokemon at all, but only joined so I could easier help my friend make a pokemon ROM hack. [[User:QTR|QTR]] 17:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | :Ending this. Now. Nobody cares if it looks masculine or feminine. That is NOT what users come to the page to find out. Instead of being very counterproductive, and trying to backseat-mod each other, direct your focus to any of the articles on this site that need work that DO NOT relate to what a Pokemon looks like. And honestly, this is coming from ME, a 21 year old guy who doesn't play Pokemon at all, but only joined so I could easier help my friend make a pokemon ROM hack. [[User:QTR|QTR]] 17:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
| Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Backsprite == | == Backsprite == | ||
[[File:Spr b g4 429.png]] | [[:a:File:Spr b g4 429.png]] | ||
The normal 4th generation backsprite has a bunch of random dark-purple pixels on it. Does anyone else see them, and why are they there? | The normal 4th generation backsprite has a bunch of random dark-purple pixels on it. Does anyone else see them, and why are they there? {{unsigned|Flyingtypefan}} | ||
== Mumargi or Mumage? == | == Mumargi or Mumage? == | ||