Talk:Mewtwo (M01): Difference between revisions

Line 297: Line 297:
::Then why mention it on the article then if it's not important? To me the cameo provided a small continuity since it depicts Mewtwo guarding over possibly the same city it looked over in the end of "Mewtwo Returns". [[User:Hitmonchan107|Hitmonchan107]] ([[User talk:Hitmonchan107|talk]]) 01:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
::Then why mention it on the article then if it's not important? To me the cameo provided a small continuity since it depicts Mewtwo guarding over possibly the same city it looked over in the end of "Mewtwo Returns". [[User:Hitmonchan107|Hitmonchan107]] ([[User talk:Hitmonchan107|talk]]) 01:08, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
:::The cameo is mentioned in the article because (other than regular characters, who appear in most or all episodes) we mention every appearance of a character for thoroughness. Appearances that are just a few seconds long and aren't part of the storyline, in my opinion, aren't significant enough to worry about if they make disambiguation tougher. We've made it clear that "Mewtwo (M01)" is inadequate; if you insist that "Mewtwo (original series)" is inadequate because "Jirachi: Wish Maker" must be included, what title do you propose for it? I can't think of an elegant title that covers it, but if you're arguing this point, you should try to have something in mind, not just be a devil's advocate. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
:::The cameo is mentioned in the article because (other than regular characters, who appear in most or all episodes) we mention every appearance of a character for thoroughness. Appearances that are just a few seconds long and aren't part of the storyline, in my opinion, aren't significant enough to worry about if they make disambiguation tougher. We've made it clear that "Mewtwo (M01)" is inadequate; if you insist that "Mewtwo (original series)" is inadequate because "Jirachi: Wish Maker" must be included, what title do you propose for it? I can't think of an elegant title that covers it, but if you're arguing this point, you should try to have something in mind, not just be a devil's advocate. [[User:Pumpkinking0192|Pumpkinking0192]] ([[User talk:Pumpkinking0192|talk]]) 01:13, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
:Devil's advocate? I'm not contradicting you, merely I feel that this Mewtwo should be categorized under the first movie which itself is eponymous with. "Mewtwo Returns" isn't a film, it's a special. Calling it "Mewtwo (M01)" still implies it's the Mewtwo of the original series, just in a more specific manner. Do you understand now? [[User:Hitmonchan107|Hitmonchan107]] ([[User talk:Hitmonchan107|talk]]) 01:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)