Talk:List of Pokémon that are not part of an evolutionary line

Move

Should this be moved to Pokémon not involved in evolution? The current title would allow fully evolved ones to be added to the list. It's Turtwig A! My talk or wiki edits 22:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Moved elsewhere. Similar, but elsewhere. —darklordtrom 10:16, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Is it important to add that in generation I there were 13 others who couldn't evolve?

? --Bee § Bwakka♂ (meh talk) 17:44, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Former

A list of Pokemon formerly not part of an evolutionary line would be fine, should it be listed here or on their own page? XVuvuzela2010X 01:39, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Kalos Pokémon's menu sprites

Will anyone please replace these ? menu sprites with their own Pokémon sprites that's because of this generation. Thank you! Cinday123 (talk) 10:10, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Type change

Is Mr. Mime a pure Psychic-type while a standalone Pokémon prior to Generation IV? --Cinday123 (Talk) 02:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

I was going to change the type, but I decided to leave it as the table is explaining that Mr. Mime was a stand alone until Gen IV (in which it was a pure psychic type).--ForceFire 02:33, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Farfetch'd + Corsola

How should we list these two now they have regional variants with evolutions? Either they moves to the 'former' list, or they get honourable mentions in the trivia. Pallukun (talk) 16:24, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

A trivia mention is more appropriate. The regular forms still don't evolve, so they don't count as "former", as the third paragraph at the top of the article says.--ForceFire 16:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Admittedly did not read that. The trivia is added Pallukun (talk) 18:17, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Combee and Salandit

Combee and Salandit can't evolve if they're male, so do they belong on this list? And if they don't, then why do Basculin, Qwilfish, Farfetch'd, and Sirfetch'd belong on the list, as like Combee and Salandit some members of their species can evolve but others can't? It's an ambiguity in the page's definition that should be addressed, as what exactly counts as being part of an evolutionary line is unclear when it comes to these species. Mr. Daikon (talk) 22:39, 1 February 2022 (UTC)