Pokémon order
The Pokémon lists on this page are in alphabetical order. Should they be in National Dex order, or is there some game-related reason to have them in alphabetical order? — Laoris (Blah) 18:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
A is the lowest IQ...
...What makes all of you think THAT? They are just IQ groups, not in any particular order! ΘρtιmαtumTalk 04:58, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Still needing improvement?
The list is now in National Number order, so I'm failing to see why the tag is still on the page. Unless there are things missing and off-kilter... —JaymesKeller 01:38, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- Rounded corners would be nice. —darklordtrom 01:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
Some Pokémon still missing
Definitely Honchkrow and Mismagius, and probably quite a few others. —βetA ZerØ 22:32, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- I agree. Also, why are some evolutionary families left out? For example, Ralts and Mudkip are in the F Group, but Kirilia, Gardevior, and Marstomp and Swampert aren't listed. What gives? —Jdthebud 09:17, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
Also Monferno and Infernape dissapeared off the face of the earth. Even though Chimchar is listed in the E group, his evos are gone.TFSpock 02:29, 28 February 2011 (UTC)TFSpock
Additional Pokémon
Using Excel, I've found that the Pokémon at the National numbers 319, 329, 330, 341, 342, 397, 398, 402, 426, 428, 429, 430, 432, 435, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, and 474 need to be added. It is 2:03 AM here, so I don't have enough time to do this before I fall asleep. Someone, please take up this vital task. Yawn........................ --Abcboy (talk) 07:05, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
Fairy Type
Does this Page get updated to include Fairy-types? Tacopill (talk) 03:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- I would guess not, because IQ groups aren't used in Gen VI, yet, and so none of these Pokémon are part Fairy. But it might be confusing not to have the Fairies be Fairies on the whole site. Is there an official policy yet? --Wynd Fox 05:10, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't seen a policy on anything. I guess, for now, we leave it as is till they come out with a new Explorer's game? Tacopill (talk) 00:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- If a page is on something that hasn't appeared since the Fairy type debuted (ex. this page, Tracey's Marill, Dawn's Togekiss), the page is not updated to include the Fairy type. --It's Funktastic~!話してください 01:05, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
- I haven't seen a policy on anything. I guess, for now, we leave it as is till they come out with a new Explorer's game? Tacopill (talk) 00:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)