1,052
edits
(→Length) |
(→Length) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Done. Previews have also shown it could be reduced further to three-wide, if needed. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] 04:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | Done. Previews have also shown it could be reduced further to three-wide, if needed. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] 04:52, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
:That's not bad at all. Great stuff.--[[User:Clarky13|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Clarky'''</span>]][[User talk:Clarky13|<span style="color:#000000;">'''13'''</span>]] 04:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | :That's not bad at all. Great stuff.--[[User:Clarky13|<span style="color:#0000FF;">'''Clarky'''</span>]][[User talk:Clarky13|<span style="color:#000000;">'''13'''</span>]] 04:55, 9 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
::Thank you. Scratch the three-wide idea though, some like Baltoy have moves that get too many appeal points, and it throws the widths off too much for a three-wide table. [[User:Drake Clawfang|Drake Clawfang]] 04:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC) |
edits