Talk:James's Victreebel: Difference between revisions

Undo revision 2463049 by Mattrd08 (talk) Please don't respond to talk comments older than 6 months old. If you want to bring it up again, make a new section for it.
(Undo revision 2463049 by Mattrd08 (talk) Please don't respond to talk comments older than 6 months old. If you want to bring it up again, make a new section for it.)
Line 20: Line 20:
:I seriously don't think that it's showing affection either. There's no evidence to prove this, and in EP269, James even says that
:I seriously don't think that it's showing affection either. There's no evidence to prove this, and in EP269, James even says that
:Victreebel is always on confusing him for food![[User:Confusion|Confusion]] 19:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
:Victreebel is always on confusing him for food![[User:Confusion|Confusion]] 19:18, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
:Yeah, I seriously doubt this myself. Having recently rewatched many early episodes, I never once got the sense that this was a sign of affection, and Meowth even insinuates at least once that Victreebel is generally disobedient.[[User:Mattrd08|Mattrd08]] ([[User talk:Mattrd08|talk]]) 05:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
13,668

edits