Can it be considered as a character?
I think considering THIS thing as a character is a bit too much. --Maxim 20:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- If it wasn't a judge, I wouldn't bother. Otherwise, it's got a name and a VA; and whether or not it should be "considered" a character...what the heck would you tag it under? We don't have a 'mech' tag. But again: a judge with a name and VA. That's my argument. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 20:54, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- Well, Infi's also technically not human...--Shiningpikablu252 20:55, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- I never said that Infi should be considered as a human. --Maxim 20:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- But she's considered a "character"? Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 20:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- She shouldn't, IMO. --Maxim 21:04, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- But she's considered a "character"? Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 20:59, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
- I never said that Infi should be considered as a human. --Maxim 20:57, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, we could make a new catergory for Infi, this guy, and the Block Bots from Destiny Deoxys. Not sure what to name it, though... --Manga-in-a-bottle 00:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- "Non-human characters", "Synthetic characters", "Characters that aren't characters", "Marginally worthy to mention because they aren't flesh characters", "Discriminated characters", "We wanna be a real boygirl characters", or "Johnny5 worshipping characters". ...I'm leaning between Synthetic and Characters-that-aren't, myself. Luna Tiger * the Arc Toraph 01:43, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
- Um, how do you create a new catergory again? --Manga-in-a-bottle 08:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)